Banking & Finance

Sudan’s RSF Forms Rival Government Amid War

Sudan’s deepening crisis now pits two rival governments against each other, each claiming legitimacy. The standoff threatens to derail peace efforts and worsen humanitarian suffering across the country.

Published

on

General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, better known as “Hemedti,” has positioned himself as the face of the RSF’s political ambitions. His leadership in forming a parallel government signals a deepening rift in Sudan’s fragile power balance.

Sudan’s RSF announces a parallel government in RSF-held regions, deepening divisions and challenging peace efforts amid civil war.

Sudan’s RSF Declares Parallel Government, Deepening War Crisis

KHARTOUM, Sudan – Sudan’s conflict took a dramatic turn after the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) announced the formation of a parallel government in areas under its control, a move analysts say could harden divisions and prolong the war against the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF).

The RSF, led by General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo “Hemedti”, made the declaration from its strongholds in Darfur and other regions, insisting that the new administration will “restore order” and “protect civilians” in territories it governs.

What the RSF Says

The group claims its government will manage services, facilitate humanitarian aid, and coordinate with international organisations to alleviate suffering. However, critics warn this is part of a strategy to legitimise RSF control and weaken the internationally recognised Sudanese state.

Impact on the War

The announcement has intensified fears that Sudan is sliding toward a Libya-style split, with rival administrations competing for legitimacy. The RSF’s move also risks complicating peace talks spearheaded by the African Union (AU) and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD).

UN officials say the war, which erupted in April 2023, has displaced more than 10 million people, making it the world’s largest displacement crisis. Both the RSF and SAF have been accused by Human Rights Watch of atrocities including indiscriminate shelling, killings, and blocking humanitarian aid.

Reactions from Khartoum and Abroad

The SAF dismissed the RSF’s announcement as “null and void,” accusing the militia of trying to undermine Sudan’s sovereignty. Western diplomats, including representatives from the United States, expressed concern that the development would deepen instability and hamper relief efforts.

Regional analysts note that the RSF’s strategy could be aimed at securing leverage in any eventual ceasefire deal, particularly regarding control over Sudan’s gold-rich regions.

The Road Ahead

With peace negotiations stalled, Sudan faces a prolonged conflict with devastating humanitarian and economic consequences. Aid agencies warn that famine-like conditions are emerging in RSF-controlled areas, while the national economy continues to collapse.

Observers say the AU and IGAD must urgently step up mediation efforts to prevent Sudan from fragmenting into rival statelets—a scenario that could destabilise the entire Horn of Africa.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending Posts